One of the constant themes in the post-World War II world has
been the American-led undermining of the United Nations. The antagonism between
the United States and the United Nations mirrors the antagonism between the
economic elite and the poor or between employers and workers. As more and more
colonies became independent nations following the end of World War II, the
electoral power in the United Nations passed from the economically advanced
nations to the far more numerous poor and lesser developed nations. That is
because the UN is based upon the principle of ‘one-nation-one-vote’.
The American response has been to starve the United Nations
by refusing to pay its financial obligations to the UN and to create exclusive
multilateral bodies that have duplicated and then superceded United Nations
Initiatives.
When the United Nations tried to launch the International
Trade Association, the United States instead supported the General Agreement on
Trade and Tariffs – which ultimately became the World Trade Organization. The
UN’s ITA was supposed to govern international trade with rules governing
employment practices and restrictive business and investment practices. Because
of American opposition, the ITA never got off the ground.
Similarly, when the UN proposed a Special Fund for Economic
Development, the U.S. created and funded an alternate structure called the
International Development Association as a branch of the World Bank.
Most critically, the United States was the driving force
behind the creation of the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund –
the two organizations that displaced the role of the United Nations Development
Program (UNDP).
All of the critical resources committed to international aid
and economic development therefore passed from the broad democratic control of
the United Nations to the elite, "one-dollar-one-vote" institutions
created by the U.S.
This process is ongoing. Currently, the WTO, controlled by
the G8’s "Quad", is attempting to become the essential framework for
the UN World Summit on Sustainable Development. This despite the fact the WTO
rules and operations consistently place environmental issues behind corporate
demands for market access and economic development.