Court Decision Slams WCB Practices
Transit Workers Win Right To Sue Employer
By Jason Foster, AFL Staff
In early February, without much fanfare and with little public
attention, a Court of Queens Bench judge in Medicine Hat issued a written decision
that has the potential to radically shake Albertas WCB system.
In his 12 page decision, Justice MacLean, granted a group of six
transit workers the right to sue their employer and other companies for a work-related
disease. His decision also harshly criticized WCB for acting in a biased fashion.
"It cannot be said that the Board is independent insofar as the
worker is concerned. It is a Board set up to protect the employers," said Justice
MacLean in the decision.
MacLean goes on to state that WCB is operating in a manner that offends
natural justice. "This is not a level playing field, it is not fair, and it offends
the basic principles of natural justice."
Under Alberta law, all injuries and diseases related to the workplace
fall under the WCB Act, which prohibits the suing of employers for work-related accidents.
Justice MacLean argues that this prohibition is being used to prevent workers from
receiving just compensation.
The six workers were exposed over a period of time to methanol and
other dangerous chemicals. All developed multiple symptoms indicative of problems
associated with chemical exposure. They applied for WCB benefits but were denied. Their
appeals also failed. WCB did not dispute the exposure, and also acknowledged the existence
of the medical symptoms, but claimed that the workers had failed to adequately demonstrate
causation.
Having exhausted all avenues of appeal at WCB, the workers launched a
lawsuit against the City of Medicine Hat and against 8 other corporations, 4 Medicine Hat
City managers and the Federal and Provincial governments claiming negligence.
Justice MacLean only ruled on if the workers had a legal right to
pursue their lawsuit. In addition to offending natural justice, MacLean argued that
WCBs process for determining causation is "less than comforting and of little
assistance". MacLean stated that "the Court will not be limited by the
so-called principles
which bind the Board."
The consequences of this decision are mixed for Alberta workers, says
Audrey Cormack, President of the AFL. "First I want to say that I am thrilled someone
in authority has finally acknowledged what we have been saying for five years, that WCB
has become an employers organization."
Cormack congratulates MacLean for making clear that WCB has been
operating in a manner that puts dollars ahead of injured workers.
She also points out that the decision has some potential downsides.
"I want to make sure this decision does not unravel the Meredith principles,
especially the commitment to no fault and to universal coverage. The courts are hardly
friendly to the concerns of working people."
"There are many questions needing adequate answers," adds
Cormack.
Cormack indicates that the AFL will be using the decision to persuade
WCB to make some crucial changes to its policies and procedures. "This is a wake-up
call for WCB. They need to revamp their claims adjudication process and their definition
of causation, among other things."
The AFL and the WCB Trade Union Coalition, a group of unions gathering
to address WCB issues, will be pressuring the WCB and the Minister of Labour to address
the concerns raised by Justice MacLean.
"The key is using the decision for the benefit of working people,
not just to transfer our issues to the courts," Cormack concludes.
| "It cannot be said that the Board is independent insofar as the
worker is concerned. It is a Board set up to protect the employers. The Board is funded by
the employers, and the Board has a duty and probably a primary duty to protect the
employer. In relation to the worker, the Board has an overwhelming wealth of knowledge and
experience. It has the financial ability to fund sophisticated investigations involving
highly qualified experts and have the material presented to them, guided, orchestrated and
propounded by its in-house counsel
[T]he rules of natural justice would identify
such circumstances as being unequal in negotiating ability and unfair. This is not a level
playing field, it is not fair, and it offends the basic principles of natural
justice." |
|