|
Proposals for reform that would truly benefit workers
If the MLA committee is honestly looking for reforms that would benefit
working Albertans, they should consider the following proposals in the areas of
certification, bargaining and strikes:
Certification: Under the current system, workers interested in joining a
union must go through a long two-stage process. First they must sign up 40
percent of workers in a given bargaining union. Then they must win the support
of fifty percent plus one of the workers in a formal certification vote. The
problem with all this is that in the period between the certification
application and the actual vote, the employer is able to exert unfair pressure
on workers (usually in the form of threats and/or promises) to vote against the
union. During this period, the employer also has almost unrestricted access to
the workers and the union has almost no access. If this were an election for
public office, it would be like allowing only one party to campaign. Elections
held in these circumstances cannot be characterized as either free or fair.
Recommendation: We recommend automatic certification be granted
once a union has signed up 50 percent plus one of workers in a given
bargaining unit. This would eliminate the unfair "electioneering"
period that exists under the current system during which employers are able
exert disproportionate influence. At the very least, if the two-step process
is maintained, the time between the certification application and the vote
should be reduced to two weeks to keep unfair employer pressure to a
minimum. Also, to discourage manipulation, the Labour Relations Board should
have the right to grant automatic certification if the employer is found
guilty of breaching the rules. Such a system would provide employers with a
strong incentive to "play fair."
Bargaining: Once a union is certified in Alberta, it is only the first
step on the long road to an agreement. In most other provinces, newly certified
unions and their employers are given a proscribed period of time to negotiate a
first collective agreement. If no deal is reached in that period, the labour
relations board will step in with the power to either impose an agreement or
send the dispute off to binding arbitration. Unfortunately, here in Alberta,
there is no time limit and the Labour Relations Board has no power to mandate a
settlement. The result is that employers who are hostile to unions will simply
attempt to wait the union out. At the same time, because there are no effective
penalties for bargaining in bad faith, employers will often engage in
"dirty tricks" campaigns or campaigns of legal foot-dragging. The goal
in such campaigns is to wear the workers down and make them feel dissatisfied
with their union so much so that they eventually vote for decertification.
The problem with all this is that it tramples on basic worker rights. Here in
Canada, workers have the right to bargain collectively. But in Alberta,
employers are allowed to undermine that right by simply refusing to bargain.
Recommendations: We recommend that the Alberta Labour Relations
Board (ALRB) be given power to send contentious first-agreement negotiations
to binding arbitration. We further recommend that the ALRB be given the
power to impose an agreement in cases were the employer has been found
guilty of bargaining in bad faith. This will give employers a real incentive
to play by the rule and bargain fairly an incentive that currently does
not exist in Alberta.
Strikes: Strikes are always the weapon of last resort for unions but
without at least the threat of a strike, working people have little real power
against the resources and influence of large employers. In most other provinces,
the right of workers to withdraw their labour is widely held and protected.
Unfortunately, the situation is significantly different in Alberta. We have the
dubious distinction of have the widest prohibitions on striking of any province
in the country. In other provinces, its common to see the right-to-strike
denied to a small number of "essential service" workers like
police, fire and emergency room workers. But here in Alberta, almost no one is
the provincial civil service has the right to strike. Thats right its
not just nurses and doctors. Everyone in the main-line civil service from
secretaries at the department of Labour to janitors at the Legislature is
denied the right to strike.
At the same time, in those sectors where strikes are legal, there are no
restrictions placed on employers from bringing in scabs ("replacement
workers") during a strike. The result is that the incentive to reach an
agreement is reduced and the likelihood of picket line confrontations is
increased. Overall, Alberta labour laws have had the perverse effect of denying
rights to public sector workers (or turning them into "criminals" when
they do go on strike) and weakening the bargaining power of private sector
workers (as they watch from the picket line as scabs take their jobs).
Recommendations: We recommend that the Alberta government remove
blanket restrictions on the right-to-strike for public sector workers. All
Canadians should have the right to withdraw their labour if the
circumstances require it. Restrictions on that right should be kept to an
absolute minimum. No one in government would dare to tell large numbers of
people what to do with their property why should they have the right to
tell them what to do or not to do with their labour? We further
recommend that the Alberta government impose a ban on the use of replacement
workers. Such a ban would reduce the likelihood of picket line
confrontations and it would provide employers and employees with a real
incentive to resolve disputes quickly and with the minimum possible
disruption to the economy.
|