[Home]
To Yulia Tymoshenko | 29Oct2009 | Will Zuzak
Nuclear Fission Reactor Technology for Ukraine
Embassy of Ukraine in Canada
310 Somerset St., West,
Ottawa, Ontario K2P 0J9
Via Email: nlysova@beauty.net.ua; emb_ca@ukremb.ca
Date: 29 October 2009
Dear Yulia Tymoshenko:
As the Prime Minister of Ukraine, as well as a candidate in the
upcoming Presidential elections, you carry a heavy
responsibility to promote and ensure energy self-sufficiency for
Ukraine -- in the field of nuclear energy, as well as oil and natural
gas.
An article in the 10 October 2009 issue of Zerkalo Nedeli by Oksana
Kosharna outlines Russian intrigues to prevent Ukraine developing its
own nuclear fission reactor technology. She describes in some detail
the negotiations and proposed agreements to provide nuclear fuel for
Ukraine's nuclear reactors, in which, presumably, you and President
Yushchenko were
involved, as well as Russian attempts to freeze out the
involvement of Westinghouse and thus blackmail Ukraine into using only
Russian-supplied fuel.
I have archived this article
on my website, together with an English-language translation and links
to my previous articles and comments. Allow me to discuss the issue
under three headings -- Iran, KIPT and Canada.
IRAN
I am sure that you are fully aware that under the specious claim that
Iran's program to develop technology to produce fuel for its nuclear
reactor(s) is a prelude to producing nuclear weapons, the United States
and Israel
are threatening to attack Iran. I have previously stated:
"I suspect that the real
motive behind the U.S./European/Russian attitude towards Iran’s nuclear
program
is not to preclude the development of nuclear weapons; it is to
preclude the development of nuclear technology for the production of
electricity outside of U.S./European/Russian control. The “West”/Russia
are
establishing a stranglehold on the world’s oil and natural gas
supplies; they appear to want to establish a similar stranglehold on
nuclear fission reactor technology."
In my opinion, second-world
countries (such as Iran and Ukraine) and even third-world
countries
should be
encouraged (rather than discouraged) to develop nuclear programs to
produce electricity for their citizens. This would contribute
to
third-world development (and eventually world peace) far more than all
the billions in "foreign aid", presently being dumped into black holes
and magically reappearing in the bank accounts of the "international
money mafia". Ukraine must not succumb to the mechanations of
the American and Israeli war-mongers.
KIPT
I am not intimately familiar with the expertise in nuclear
energy available within Ukraine. Nevertheless, it is recognized that
the Kharkiv Institute of Physics and Technology
(KIPT) pioneered
the establishment of nuclear physics research within the Soviet Union
in 1932. Many famous scientists were associated with this Institute
and, despite the Holodomor and the Great Terror of the 1930s, it
remains a very competent institution to this day. (See "Laboratory No.
1: Nuclear Physics in Ukraine" by Yurij Ranyuk, AKTA 2005,
ISBN 966-7021-93-9 -- in Ukrainian.)
Perhaps KIPT and similar institutions within Ukraine could be
asked to develop a strategy for the optimum development of nuclear
reactor technology and a complete nuclear fuel cycle for existing and
future reactors. Although existing reactors within Ukraine are of the
VVER-1000 and VVER-440 types, there is no reason to preclude the
establishment of other types of reactors. This may entail collaboration
with other countries, including the Russian Federation and the United
States. What is important is that the design, construction, operation
and fueling be carried out on Ukrainian soil controlled by citizens of
Ukraine.
CANADA
The Kosharna article refers to negotiations with companies from South
Korea and Canada; with Westinghouse and the French AREVA. Since I
worked for Atomic Energy of Canada in the fields of fission and
controlled nuclear fusion, I am rather familiar with Canada's CANDU
reactor. The CANDU uses heavy water as a moderator and is, thus,
extremely neutron efficient. It uses natural uranium as a fuel, such
that no uranium enrichment is required. Furthermore, it can use a
thorium-based fuel and an organic fluid as a coolant.
Should uranium enrichment prove to be an insurmountable obstacle, I
could certainly recommend Ukraine considering the CANDU reactor as an
alternate to the VVER design.
In conclusion, I would like to point out that the establishment of a
Ukrainian nuclear industry is not just about producing electricity or
energy self-sufficiency. It is about Ukraine developing a sophisticated
technological infrastructure within which Ukrainian citizens can work
and thrive. It is the difference between self-reliance and serfdom. I
sincerely hope that the Ukrainian government can resolve this challenge
for the benefit of Ukraine and its citizens.
Respectfully submitted
William Zuzak, Ph.D., P.Eng. (retired)
2009.10.29
The archival addresses of this file and the links referred to above are:
http://www.telusplanet.net/public/mozuz/
http://www.telusplanet.net/public/mozuz/wllzzk/zuzak20091029Tymoshenko.html
http://www.telusplanet.net/public/mozuz/wllzzk/zuzak20070127Tymoshenko.html
http://www.telusplanet.net/public/mozuz/ukrainophobia/kosharna20091010ZerkaloNedeli.html